Agile Israel

Let us take a look at this test. When I saw it, the code under test called to me: "Help me, I being intimately harassed here!" The problem is that this tests knows all sorts of unrelated things about the code under test. It knows that it should redirect, it knows where it should redirect, etc. What is the relation between kicking off the checkout...

Let us take a look at this test. When I saw it, the test cried out in pain to me: "Help me, I am so overworked." This test is doing far too much. I drew the battle line on the test, just to give you a clear indication on what is going on. What we are asserting are things that have nothing to do with what the test is supposed to test.This is...

Jacob have an interesting perspective on testability: The thing is that using Typemock means that you can unit test literally any public method of any public class, regardless of any and all internal dependencies that class might have. And you can do so without changing the design and/or architecture of your software at all. In other words, using Typemock...

Okay, now that we are over the sensationalist headline, the actual problem is more complex than that. Let us assume that we have the following interface: public interface IComplexGeneric<T> { void GenericMethod<K>(); } Up until .Net 3.5 SP1, Rhino Mocks was perfectly happy to deal with such an interface (well, not happy , exactly, that requires...

Thanks!